The Effects of Privatization on Efficiency: How Does Privatization Work?
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 34, Heft 9, S. 1537-1556
24 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 34, Heft 9, S. 1537-1556
SSRN
In: Public choice, Band 140, Heft 1-2, S. 185-204
ISSN: 1573-7101
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: CAMA Working Paper No. 67/2019
SSRN
Working paper
In: CAMA Working Paper No. 68/2017
SSRN
Working paper
In: Revue économique, Band 67, Heft 6, S. 1141-1151
ISSN: 1950-6694
Ce travail examine les effets du terrorisme sur la croissance économique en Inde. En utilisant un modèle de Markov à changement de régime, on trouve des preuves que le terrorisme a des effets importants et négatifs sur la croissance économique de l'Inde. Nos résultats empiriques montrent aussi que l'ampleur de ces effets est plus grande dans des périodes de haute croissance économique. Enfin, nous comparons l'ampleur des effets de « brutalité » et de « fréquence » des attaques terroristes et nous concluons que l'effet de « fréquence » est légèrement plus élevé que l'effet de « brutalité ». JEL Classification: C32, E2.
In: Review of financial economics: RFE, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 33-46
ISSN: 1873-5924
AbstractWe investigate the effects of various tax policy innovations on stock market returns. By using a vector autoregressive model that controls for the mutual causality between fiscal policy and financial market performance, we test whether financial markets serve as a transmission mechanism for tax policy innovations. Our findings indicate that indirect taxes have a larger effect on market returns than do labor taxes. Further, corporate tax innovations do not have any statistically significant effect on stock returns. We consider that this finding is a result of a firm's ability to switch between equity financing and bond financing.
SSRN
In: CAMA Working Paper No. 72/2016
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: Defence & peace economics, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 1-10
ISSN: 1476-8267
In: Review of economics: Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Band 73, Heft 3, S. 211-221
ISSN: 2366-035X
Abstract
By utilizing a novel data set of 24 democracies for the 1972–2018 period, we investigate how election outcomes, including election surprises, are priced by the stock market. We show that an election surprise increases volatility but has no significant effect on excess returns. A win by a coalition announced prior to the election decreases volatility, however, a large winning percentage for the lead party within the coalition decreases excess returns. An unexpected winning margin over the closest competitor by the lead party decreases volatility by consolidating power, but only in parliamentary elections. Party orientation for the winning party affects neither excess returns nor volatility, even if it is unexpected.
SSRN
Working paper